Sweet 16 Question

[Three]

With all due respect to Don and his great work, here is a take on indices by the controversial Eliot Jacobson.

http://apheat.net/2014/02/20/the-not-so-illustrious-18/

[Norm]

With all due respect to Don and his great work, here is a take on indices by the controversial Eliot Jacobson.

I have a problem with the article. We all know, now, that there are certain indices that are more important and their gain is dramatically more important than the remaining indices, particularly as decks increase. The suggestion that the study wasn't complete bothers me. Fact is, once you get past the first 24, the next indices become more and more difficult to determine, and more and more dependent on the rules, decks, strategy, etc. I spent some time years back looking at a method of going beyond 18 given a particular set of circumstances. My conclusion was that it was a pointless exercise and that you should go with your gut and comfort level should you wish to expand your list.